Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (2) |
| October, 2009 (5) |
| September, 2009 (7) |
| August, 2009 (7) |
| July, 2009 (11) |
| June, 2009 (10) |
| May, 2009 (7) |
| April, 2009 (14) |
| March, 2009 (22) |
| February, 2009 (17) |
| January, 2009 (8) |
| December, 2008 (37) |
| November, 2008 (24) |
| October, 2008 (37) |
| September, 2008 (25) |
| August, 2008 (30) |
| July, 2008 (8) |
| June, 2008 (11) |
| May, 2008 (15) |
| April, 2008 (3) |
| March, 2008 (8) |
| February, 2008 (6) |
| January, 2008 (12) |
| December, 2007 (9) |
| November, 2007 (13) |
| October, 2007 (20) |
Search
Archives
More Links
|
 Monday, May 12, 2008
Estrous Does Are Mute, but Bucks Still Respond to Calls
Posted by DDH Staff
White-tailed deer behaviorists and those who raise deer for research purposes mostly agree that white-tailed does are typically not that vocal during the rut. In fact, in their reports in Deer & Deer Huning over the past 30 years, many of the top behavorists and researchers have stated that does are most vocal during the fawning season. Dr. Leonard Lee Rue III was possibly the first behaviorist to document this whitetail tendency, noting how does make a soft, cat-like mewing sound when they call for their hidden fawns. While photographing whitetails in the 1950s, Rue noted how fawns, after hearing a doe’s bleats, jumped to their feet and went to their mothers to nurse. Despite a doe’s mute tendencies in autumn, both Rue and Charles Alsheimer agree that bleat calls (tubes and cans) are extremely effective for attracting adult deer during fall hunting seasons. These seemingly contradictory observations bring rise to an interesting question: Are all whitetails trained at birth to respond to doe bleats? We might never know, but we do know that calling elicits a definite and pronounced response in deer. To learn more, check out my new article, "Bleat Performance," in the September issue of the magazine. It hits newsstands on June 24. Dan Schmidt, Editor
Monday, May 12, 2008 1:33:51 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Monday, May 05, 2008
A Sign of the Times?
Posted by DDH Staff
 Attached is a picture of a deer I have seen on my way to work every day for the past month. I grew up knowing that if I asked someone nicely, I could hunt or fish on their property. One deer season many years ago, I was driving home from a morning hunt when I spotted a nice buck and several does about 200 yards into a field. I took the next gravel road off the highway and knocked on the door of the first house I came to. An older lady and her son answered the door. I told them about the deer I had spotted and asked if I could go in after him. They said go ahead, but watch out for the cattle back there. I drove back toward the highway, parked in a field entrance, grabbed my rifle and started sneaking back toward the area where the deer had been. I was about 2 or 3 hundred yards from the truck when I spotted white flags bouncing over a hilltop. I thought I had lost my chance but something caught my eye, antlers. The buck was still standing but I could only see his head and antlers when he raised them to check the situation. I could get no closer than I was, and a head shot was all I had. I was prone and had a good steady rest with my .270 and took the shot. He was out of sight, but I couldn't tell if he ran or was down. After walking to the sight I fount that he was not just beyond a ridge, but standing at the edge of a washout. He was now laying in the bottom of a steep muddy gully. I grabbed his antlers to take a look and he came back to life. I jumped back and the buck began lungeing like a horse does when it tries to get up. After several tries I thought he was going to get up so I shot him again, and that killed him quickly. After checking him out I found the first shot had left a bare streak up the flat spot on his head, right between the antlers. It had knocked him out. It was quite a chore to get him up out of that gully.I took the deer back to the landowners house to show them and thank them, and they were more excited than I was. The old woman was acting like a kid that had just taken the deer herself. Just before Christmas that year I dropped by their house and gave them some sticks of summer sausage and the excitement started all over again. That was a long time ago, and I bet there are very few folks that would let a complete stranger hunt like that anymore. The grandkids inherit the farm, don't know how to run it or are just too lazy, and they sell it to hunting clubs.This "business" of hunting leases, and landowners becoming more concerned about liability is going to be the death of hunting as I know it, and it is a crying shame. I live in the country but do not own enough land to hunt. Fortunatly, I have good relations with some neighbors that own lots of good hunting ground. They let me hunt, and I keep and eye on their ground, clean up the trees that fall into the fields after high winds or ice, and give them some deer meat. No money ever changes hands, and thats the way it should be. Robert Rowland A long-time D&DH reader from northwest Missouri
Monday, May 05, 2008 8:11:48 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Friday, May 02, 2008
States Might Adopt Shed Hunting Seasons
Posted by DDH Staff
Talk about a few bad apples spoiling the bushel. Thanks to the actions of some hooligans, Nevada, Montana, Wyoming and Idaho are considering enacting laws and seasons on the gathering of shed antlers from deer and elk. According to published reports, wildlife officials from those states have seen an increase in activity from individuals who harass deer and elk in efforts to get them to shed their antlers prematurely. For example, in April, Nevada game officials apprehended a man who used an ATV to chase mule deer through sagebrush in attempts to get them to drop their antlers. Montana has been dealing with this problem for several years, and has already implemented closed seasons on shed hunting in certain parts of its elk range. Fines for harassing deer and elk in that state can range up to $500 per violation. Other reports include violations in Idaho where shed hunters were using off-road motorcycle to chase animals. A date-specific shed-hunting season? Now I think I've heard it all. --Dan Schmidt, Editor
Friday, May 02, 2008 8:33:31 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Questions & Answers About Doe Harvests
Posted by DDH Staff
One of the most questions we get here at D&DH is, "How many does should I harvest from my property each year?"
That's a great question, to which there are no easy answers. However, through some of the research provided by our longtime contributing editors, we have formulated some guidelines that are just that ... guidelines for the art of proactive deer management.
Before setting an antlerless harvest goal on your property, you need to know what type of habitat you have. Is it prolific, mediocre or poor? What type of deer density do you already have? These questions can really only be answered accurately by your local state-employed deer biologist.
If you own or manage more than 500 acres, I would strongly suggest contacting someone from your state agency. Ask them to visit you on their next tour through your area and survey your property. Most guys will be happy to do it, especially if it's at their discretion and if it's going to help with the area's overall deer management program. However, if you are like most D&DH readers and own/manage less than 250 acres, here is a rough guideline of how to estimate and then formulate your own plan.
If your land is prolific (50+ deer per square mile, which is common nowadays--too high but common) and the habitat is excellent, a good range to shoot for is a harvest of two or three adult does per 100 acres. You could add one or two doe fawns to the harvest and not really effect things too much. If you take out more adult does, you run the risk of severely affecting the local herd dynamics. It's important to remember that adult does have smaller home ranges than bucks, and the fact that does live in maternally related groups with overlapping home ranges.
Is it possible to "overshoot" a doe herd? Yes. However, to get a good handle on this potential problem, you need to have a firm grasp on what your neighbors are doing. If they aren't shooting does, you might have to ramp up your efforts. If they are shooting does (and the habitat is at or under density goals), err on the side of taking out one adult doe per 100 acres and two or three doe fawns.
What about buck fawns? Don't worry about it. You are bound to have some in your harvest. The national average is about 22 percent in the annual harvest. No big deal, and absolutely no effect on buck populations in areas with high deer densities. If your goal is to produce a healthier herd and better buck population, a few buck fawns in the harvest is the collateral damage that's necessary for achieving the end result. To help prevent buck fawns from harvest, use a pair of quality binoculars when hunting. However, don't get bent out of shape if mistakes are made. Those buck fawns will be long gone from your property through dispersal by the time their 18 months old anyway.
We will have more on these topics in the coming issues of D&DH.
Dan Schmidt, Editor
Friday, May 02, 2008 1:54:48 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Thursday, May 01, 2008
Virginia Rewrites Record Books
Posted by DDH Staff
Virginia’s harvest of 240,000 whitetails last year not only represented a 7 percent jump over the 2006 season. “This was clearly our highest recorded harvest,” said Nelson Lafon, deer project coordinator for the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (DGIF), in The News & Advance. In fact, the 2007 take was 13 percent above the annual median total for the past decade! As The News & Advance noted, DGIF has made a concerted effort to push up the doe harvest in recent years, liberalizing seasons and available tags. “Doe kills also outnumbered those of antlered bucks for the first time since the check system started, Lafon said. There were roughly 500 more killed this past year.” DGIF has also targeted urban deer populations. “[C]onflicts with deer in urban areas have risen in recent years, Lafon said. They come to these spots to find sanctuary, he said. Since 2003, he said nearly 20 cities and towns, including Lynchburg, have taken part in an archery program that allows hunters to target them in urban areas without violating laws that prohibit firearms. Bow kills climbed 1 percent this past season and crossbow kills, which became legal for all deer hunters three years ago, increased 21 percent.” — Brian McCombie, deeranddeerhunting.com contributor
Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:10:15 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Tips for Planting Pines
Posted by DDH Staff
Although red pines aren't exactly the tree of choice when it comes to providing deer habitat, they do provide hiding cover extremely fast, and their are quite easy to get established. I have dabbled with planting a very small amount of red pines (75) this spring and have learned some tips that might assist you as well. The key to planting any types of pines (or spruce, or cedar, or fir) is to remove weed competition near the planting site. On large scales, planting sites need to be cultivated or sprayed a year or more in advance. On smaller scales (like mine), this can be done by scalping the sod in a square-foot area. Position the seedling and backfill. Tamp the soil firmly to remove air pockets. An added boost would be to add wood mulch around the perimeter (eventual drip line). Be sure to keep the mulch at least 4 inches away from tree trunk. If it's too close, it can heat up the soil stress the tree in summer (even kill it). Mulching is usually not an option for large-scale plantings, but the trees will eventually take root and outgrow the competition. It just takes a bit longer. To provide maximum growth and dense cover, space the trees 6 feet apart in rows and space the rows 8 feet apart. There are numerous diseases pines can contract. For more information on those, click here. Dan Schmidt, Editor
Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:48:25 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Monday, April 28, 2008
Corn is King in Coastal Plain
Posted by DDH Staff
A highlight from the September issue of D&DH, which will hit newsstands in about a month: Field Editor Bob Zaiglin reports on the latest findings from the Southeast Deer Study Group. Among them is a recently completed study by Charles Ruth, Deer Project Leader in South Carolina. Among his findings, Ruth and his associates studied how supplemental feeds are used throughout private lands in the Southeast. They learned that corn was distributed on 94 percent of the properties with an average of 18 locations per property, 7½ months per year. An average of 34,600 pounds of corn was distributed per property equating to 1,200 pounds of corn per deer harvested. At a price of $4.50 per bushel, this represents a cost of $94.50 per deer harvested. Extrapolating survey results to the region yields 80,000 bait stations and 2.33 million bushels of feed at a cost of $10.4 million. Baiting and feeding deer is as big a business as it is controversial! Be sure to read Bob's full report in the September issue. Dan Schmidt, Editor
Monday, April 28, 2008 9:36:33 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Honeysuckle Is No Friend to Habitat
Posted by DDH Staff
In the January issue of the magazine, Tes Jolly presented an informative piece on how Southern landowners have used pre-established honeysuckle to their benefit as a deer browse source. One thing we should have done a better job at (and I will take blame for this) is that landowners elsewhere should not introduce this plant to their properties, especially in the upper Midwest. My good friend Aaron McCullough of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources was kind enough to share his expertise on the dangers of honeysuckle: 1. Habitat Japanese honeysuckle readily invades open natural communities, often by seed spread by birds. An aggressive colonizer of successional fields, this vine also will invade mature forest and open woodlands such as post oak flatwoods and pin oak flatwoods. Forests with either natural or unnatural openings are often invaded by Japanese honeysuckle when birds drop seeds into these light gap areas. Deep shading reduces the amount of invasion. 2. Life History Japanese honeysuckle climbs and drapes over native vegetation, shading it out. It is capable of completely covering herbaceous and understory plants, and climbing trees to the canopy. The semi-evergreen condition of this honeysuckle allows for growth both prior to and after dormancy of other deciduous plants. The prolific growth covers and smothers vegetation present including understory shrubs and trees in forested communities. Although this prolonged growth period is beneficial to the plant, it is also beneficial in controlling the plant. Vegetative runners are most prolific in the open sun and will resprout where touching the soil, forming mats of new plants. This honeysuckle will display little growth under moderate shade. In deep shade, runners develop but often die back. Flowering and seed development are heaviest in open-sun areas. Seedling establishment and growth is slow in the first 2 years of development of a new honeysuckle colony. 3. Effects Upon Natural Areas This aggressive vine seriously alters or destroys the understory and herbaceous layers of the communities it invades, including prairies, barrens, glades, flatwoods, savannas, floodplain and upland forests. Japanese honeysuckle also may alter understory bird populations in forest communities. 4. Current Status Japanese honeysuckle is categorized as an exotic weed under the Illinois Exotic Weed Control Act of 1987. As such, its commercial sale in Illinois is prohibited. Please keep these factors in mind and opt for native browse plantings when planning your next project. Dan Schmidt, Editor
Monday, April 28, 2008 7:59:50 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Beggars Can't Be Choosers
Posted by DDH Staff
That old saying is certainly ringing true for the deer near our home offices. Here is a picture I took off the front porch of my house yesterday evening. The photo doesn't show all of them, but 15 deer in total showed up just before nightfall. What were they eating? Willow leaves and twigs. Yes, things have gotten that bad around here. We still have about a foot of really hard, crusty snow in the woods and the deer are really feeling the effects of this long winter. --Dan Schmidt   
Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:50:25 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Still Wearing the Headgear
Posted by DDH Staff
Although the majority of white-tailed bucks have shed their antlers
from last year, I am still receiving reports of deer still holding on
to one side and, in rare cases, both sides. The following photo was
taken by a good friend of mine (and loyal D&DH reader) from Waupaca, Wis., which is just
south of our editorial offices here in northeast WI. This photo was
taken Sunday, March 16. We are keeping track of dates for sightings
across the country, so please add your notes to this post. --D.E.S. 
Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:07:10 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
|